Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 929 SW2D 834 - Rust v. Hammons

Rust v. Hammons’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Racer v. Utterman · Tune v. Synergy Gas Corp. · Wingate Ex Rel. Carlisle v. Lester E. Cox Medical Center · Arnold v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. · Klein v. General Electric Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the opinion of the expert is drawn from a hypothetical question required because the expert lacks personal knowledge of all material facts, it is error to admit the testimony if the question does not embody substantially all of the material facts relating to the subject or omits necessary elements. The hypothetical question need not include all material facts in evidence but it must fairly hypothesize the material facts reasonably relevant to and justly presenting the questioner’s theory of the case so that an answer of assistance to the jury in proper determination of the case may be elicited.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.