Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 929 SW2D 85 - Geochem Tech Corp. v. Verseckes

Geochem Tech Corp. v. Verseckes’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2010

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

70199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co. · Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc. · Brown v. United States · Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The movant for summary judgment has the burden of showing that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that it is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law; (2) In deciding whether there is a disputed material fact issue precluding summary judgment, evidence favorable to the non-movant will be taken as true; and (3) Every reasonable inference must be indulged in favor of the non-movant and any doubts resolved in its favor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “While a confidential relationship might have existed between [the defendant] and ... HGS, the summary judgment evidence shows that no relationship, confidential or otherwise, existed between [the plaintiff and defendant].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.