State v. Hollis’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently September 2010 · most notably Calmat of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. Miller (1993), City of Phoenix v. Consolidated Water Company (1966)
43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. La MacChia · Washington v. United States · Pima County v. Bilby · People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Dunn · BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY, ETC. v. Cannon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“That the landowner, in default of proper condemnation action by the State, must himself institute proceedings to secure compensation does not change the essential nature of the cause of action. It is still in the nature of a condemnation of a private property right by the State under the sovereign right of eminent domain.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is competent to show the value of property as it would have been if no such [project] had been contemplated. In other words, the property cannot be charged with a lesser value at the time of taking when the decrease in such value is occasioned by reason of the taking itself. [Citations- omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.