State v. Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably State v. Gordon (1989), State v. Mitchell (1970)
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 50 Cal. 2d 383 - People v. Wein · People v. Chessman · State of Arkansas v. State of Tennessee · Nebraska v. Iowa · State of Nebraska v. State of Lowa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““§ 13-492 A. A person, * * * who seizes, confines, inveigles, entices, decoys, abducts, conceals, kidnaps or carries away any individual by any means whatsoever with intent to hold or detain, or who holds or detains such individual for ransom, reward or otherwise, * * * is guilty of a felony.” (Emphasis supplied)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hunter · State v. Mileham““In State v. Taylor, 82 Ariz. 289 , 312 P. 2d 162 (1957) we answered the argument that A.R.S. § 13-492, subd. A applies only to kidnapping with intent to obtain pecuniary gain. * * * We held that the words ‘or otherwise’ in the clause describing the types of specific intent which fall within the statute made that clause broad enough to include the intent to commit sexual assault, * * *. ‡ ‡ $ ‡ ‡ ‡ We therefore now hold that the crime of kidnapping with intent to commit rape may be charged under A.R.S. § 13-492, subd. A.” 93 Ariz. at 340-341 , 380 P.2d at 1002 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hunter · State v. Miranda“the gradual, imperceptible addition to land forming the banks of a stream by the deposit of waterborne solids or by the gradual recession of water which exposes previously submerged terrain.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.