Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 ARK 103 - Peters v. Townsend

Peters v. Townsend’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
May 1962
most recently cited

2 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 1962

2 district · 20 state decisions

80191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bensieck v. Cook · Sanford v. . Sanford · Maloney v. Dewey · Stigers v. Brent · Cox v. Gress

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ <*** p|. wag regarded as error to proceed against him without such guardian. If the insanity of a defendant in a pending suit was suggested, but had not been judicially ascertained, the court gave opportunity for an inquisition to be held, or took the necessary steps to determine the question for itself; and, having ascertained that the defendant was mentally incapable of making his defense, it appointed a guardian ad litem for him, and thereafter imposed upon him the restraints of infancy.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The statute refers in express words only to persons judicially found to be of unsound mind; but it is not to be doubted that the Legislature intended to give equal protection to persons of unsound mind in actions by or against them, though not judicially declared to be such. The language of the statute warrants that construction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.