93 Ark. App. 217 - Gangi v. Edmonds’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rad-Razorback Ltd. Partnership v. B.G. Coney Co. · Huffman v. Fisher · Huffman v. Fisher · 75 Ark. App. 8 - Carter v. Reddell · 72 Ark. App. 94 - Bell v. Wardell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the child’s preference; (2) the effect of the change of the child’s surname on the preservation and development of the child’s relationship with each parent; (3) the length of time the child has borne a given name; (4) the degree of community respect associated with the present and proposed surnames; (5) the difficulties, harassment, or embarrassment that the child may experience from bearing the present or proposed surname; and (6) the existence of any parental misconduct or neglect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.