Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 Cal. App. 358 - Chaplin v. Amador

93 Cal. App. 358 - Chaplin v. Amador’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
April 1981
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 1981 · most notably 513 F. Supp. 1339 - Estate of Presley v. Russen (1981), Lahr v. Adell Chemical Co. (1962)

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

1001928193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on International News Service v. Associated Press · Wilbur v. Wilbur · Gjurich v. Fieg · Modesto Creamery v. Stanislaus Creamery Co. · Banzhaf v. Chase

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The case of plaintiff does not depend on his right to the exclusive use of the role, garb, and mannerisms, etc.; it is based upon fraud and deception. The right of action in such a case arises from the fraudulent purpose and conduct of appellant and injury caused to the plaintiff thereby, and the deception to the public, and it exists independently of the law regulating trade-marks, or of the ownership of such trade-marks or trade-names by plaintiff. It is plaintiff’s right to be protected against those who would injure him by fraudulent means — that is, by counterfeiting his role — or, in other words, plaintiff has the right to be protected against ‘unfair competition in business.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.