93 Cal. App. 2d 7 - In Re LeVan’s Empirical Analysis
1949
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1998
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 78 Cal. App. 23 - In Re Matter of Hill · 127 Cal. App. 773 - People v. Helko · 127 Cal. App. 773 - In Re Pierce
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . since the appeal is upon the judgment roll alone, we must assume that the proceedings taken in the lower court were regular in all respects (In re Pierce, 127 Cal.App. 773, 775 [ 16 P.2d 765 ]), and we are confined to an examination of the clerk’s transcript on appeal to determine whether there is any reversible error. “An examination of such record fails to disclose any error, but on the contrary, shows that each document and order was duly and regularly made and entered.” (See also In re Silva, 213 Cal. 446, 448 [ 2 P.2d 341 ]; In re Holt, 121 Cal.App.2d 276, 278 [ 263 P.2d 50 ].)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.