Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 F.1d 1 - Woodside v. Ciceroni

Woodside v. Ciceroni’s Empirical Analysis

93 F. 1 · 1899

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Miller Lux Incorporated v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Company (1908), McDaniel v. Traylor (1905)

6 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions

901899190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holland v. Challen · Smith v. Adams · Stark v. Starrs · Welsh v. . Taylor · William Peirsoll v. James Elliott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In a suit to quiet title, or to remove a cloud therefrom, it is not the value of the defendant’s claim which is the amount in controversy, but it is the whole of the real- estate to which the claim extends. It would be impossible, for instance, to estimate the value of an interest claimed under a forged or fraudulent instrument. It is the property to which such an instrument relates that is the subject of the controversy.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A suit to quiet the title to parcels of real property, or to remove a cloud therefrom, by which their use and enjoyment by the owner are impaired, is brought within the cognizance of the court, under the. statute, only by the value of the property affected.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.