Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 F.1d 191 - In re Collier

In re Collier’s Empirical Analysis

93 F. 191 · 1899

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
February 1971
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1971

2 federal appellate · 4 district ·

50189919001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roy v. Louisville N. O. & T. R. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A fair construction of the above language indicates that it was the intention to allow voluntary bankrupts to file their petition without the payment in advance of the fees therefor only in case they did not have, and could not obtain, the money with which to pay such fees. In other words, if the bankrupt was absolutely without money or effects of any kind, but was able to borrow from his friends money with which to pay the court costs, he could not properly make the affidavit required in this case, and it would be his duty to pay the fees.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “«* * * Collect the fees of the clerk, referee and trustee, In each case instituted before filing the petition, except the petition of a proposed voluntary bankrupt which is accompanied by an affidavit stating that the petitioner is without, and cannot obtain, the money with which to pay such fees.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.