Anderson v. Condict’s Empirical Analysis
93 F. 349 · 1899
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1967
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Union Trust Co of New York v. Illinois Midland Ry Co Borg · Roberts v. Northern Pacific Railroad · Ferguson v. Arthur · Olcott v. Headrick · 26 N.J. Eq. 474 - Klein v. Jewett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is not presumable that the court would divest itself of the power to pay the expenses of operations which it had assumed. ■ That would be an act of lelo de se.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.