Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 F.1d 377 - Keener v. Baker

Keener v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

93 F. 377 · 1899

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
February 1933
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1933

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

5018991900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richards v. Edick · Hazard Powder Co. v. Volger · Herfort v. Cramer · Davis v. Goodman · Glaspie v. Keator

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Wliere there is any defect, imperfection, or omission in any pleading, whether in substance or form, which would have been a fatal objection upon demurrer, yet, if the issue joined be such as necessarily required, on the trial, proof of the facts so defectively or imperfectly stated or omitted, and without which it is not to be presumed that either the judge would direct the jury to give, or the jury would have given, the verdict, such defect, imperfection, or omission is cured by the verdict.” Andrews’ Stephen's Pleading, § 109.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The sufficiency of this pleading was not challenged until more than a month after the adjudication upon it, and after verdict or judgment an objection that the petition fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is tenable only when the pleading fails to allege the substance or foundation of a good cause of action, and the fact that it is otherwise defective, informal, indefinite, or incomplete is no longer material.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.