Gilmore v. Herrick’s Empirical Analysis
93 F. 525 · 1899
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1926
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tennessee v. Union & Planters' Bank · Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Cox · White v. Ewing · Compton v. Jesup · Rouse v. Hornsby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no language in any removal act, which justifies the removal of a cause from a state court to a Federal court, on the ground that it is ancillary to a suit in a Federal court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Pollitz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.