Lloyd v. Chapman’s Empirical Analysis
93 F. 599 · 1899
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1937
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grape Creek Coal Co. v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. · Van Gunden v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co. · United States v. Goodrich · Deitsch v. Wiggins · Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Conoley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Tbe plaintiff in error or appellant shall file with the clerk of the court below, with his petition for the writ of error or appeal, an assignment of er rors, which shall set out separately and particularly each error asserted and intended to be urged. No writ of error or appeal shall be allowed until such assignment of errors shall have been filed. When the error alleged is to the admission or to the rejection of evidence, the assignment of errors shall quote the full substance of the evidence admitted or rejected. When the error alleged is to the charge of the court, the assignment of errors shall set out the part referred to totidem verbis, whether it be in instructions given or in instructions refused. Such assignment of errors shall form part of the transcript of the record and be printed with it. When this is not done, counsel will not be heard, except at the request of the court; and errors not assigned according to this rule will be disregarded, but the court, at its option, may notice a plain error not assigned.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““There shall be annexed to and returned with any writ of error for the removal of a cause * * * an authenticated transcript of the record, an assignment of errors, and a prayer for reversal, with a citation to the adverse party.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bernard v. Lea
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.