Cramer v. Singer Mfg. Co.’s Empirical Analysis
93 F. 636 · 1899
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 1940
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schroeder v. Lahrman · Andrews v. National Foundry & Pipe Works, Ltd. · Cannon River Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Rogers · Cramer v. Singer Manuf'g Co. · Lacroix v. Lyons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In so holding, the circuit court applied the well-settled rule that one who, for his own Interests, assumes the defense of an action, is bound by the judgment as if he had been a party thereto or In privity with the defendant. But it must not be overlooked that the rule is subject tb the limitation that, in order that one not a party who has assumed the burden of the defense of an action shall be bound by the judgment therein rendered, his connection with the defense must be open and known to the opposite party.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lane v. Welds
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.