Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 F.1d 767 - Bernheimer v. Bryan

Bernheimer v. Bryan’s Empirical Analysis

93 F. 767 · 1899

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
December 1991
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 12 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 1991 · most notably Josiah Coder v. William Arts (1909), First National Bank of Chicago v. Chicago Title Trust Company (1905)

11 federal appellate · 12 district ·

14018991900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Claflin v. Houseman · Smith v. Whitney · Elk v. Wilkins · Mayor v. Cooper · Lathrop Assignee v. Drake et al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(b) Suits by the trustee shall only be brought or prosecuted in the courts where the bankrupt, whose estate is being administered by such trustee, might have brought or prosecuted them if proceedings in bankruptcy had not been instituted; unless by consent of the proposed defendant.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Did the district court, as a court of bankruptcy, have jurisdiction to try the title to the goods involved in this controversy by summary proceedings, seizure of the goods, and a rule to account entered against the adverse claimant?” Page 598, 35 C. C. A., and page 780, 93 Fed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.