Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 F.1d 787 - In re Rudnick

In re Rudnick’s Empirical Analysis

93 F. 787 · 1899

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
December 1978
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 1978

4 federal appellate · 6 district ·

50189919001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Whitney · Mayor v. Cooper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “■“The judge may, upon the application of parties in interest, filed at any ■time within six months after a composition has been confirmed, set the same aside and' reinstate the case if it shall he made to appear at the trial that fraud was practiced in the procuring of such composition, and that the knowledge thereof ha's'come to the petitioner since the confirmation of the composition.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.