Grove v. Grove’s Empirical Analysis
93 F. 865 · 1899
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 1963
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Callan v. Wilson · Smith v. Lyon · Goodman v. Niblack · Greeley v. Lowe · James Conolly v. Richard Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well settled that when a mortgagor has cony eyed all of his, interest in the mortgaged premises, and retains the equity of redemption no longer, he is not a necessary party to a suit for the foreclosure of the mortgage, and a decree may be obtained, extinguishing all adverse claims against the property, without the presence of the mortgagor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cooper v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.