Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

93 F.2d 1008

Docket No. 7343.

Knapp v. Timken

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 9, 1937.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1937-12-09

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1937-12-09

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2001

2 district ·

5019371940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Maxwell V. Beghtol, of Lincoln, Neb., and Davies & Eshner, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

¶2Lynch, Day, Pontius & Lynch, of Canton, Ohio, and Tolies, Hogsett & Ginn, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

¶3Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The court being of opinion that no error was committed by the trial court in admitting or rejecting evidence offered on the hearing or in directing the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.

/93/f2d/1008 · .json · Public domain