Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

93 F.2d 1017

Docket No. 7865.

Tinkoff v. Ryan

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 9, 1937.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1937-12-09

2 counsel of record

Relies on 21 F. Supp. 185 - Tinkoff v. Ryan

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1937-12-09

¶1For opinion below, see 21 F.Supp. 185.

¶2Tyrell A. Richardson, of Chicago, 111., for appellant.

¶3John C. Lehr and Carl R. Perkins, both of Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

¶4Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6It is ordered that the petition of appellant to extend time to file answer to the appellee’s motion to dismiss be, and the same is hereby, denied.

¶7It is ordered that the motion of appellant for leave to file petition for contempt *1018against the respondent, John J. Ryan, and John E. Murtagh, assistant superintendent of the United States Detention Farm, Milan, Mich., be, and the same is hereby, denied.

¶8It is ordered that the motion of the appellee to extend the time within which to file an answer to the petition for contempt be, and the same is hereby, denied.

¶9It is ordered that the appellant’s motion for leave to file certain papers with this court, which were considered by the Honorable James C. McReynolds, Justice of the United States Supreme Court, be, and the same is hereby, denied.

¶10On consideration of the motion of the appellee to dismiss this appeal for the reason that any questions tendered therein have now become moot, by reason of the release of the appellant from custody by the appellee because of completion of the sentence imposed upon the appellant, it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.

/93/f2d/1017 · .json · Public domain