Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 F.2d 313 - Wyman v. Newhouse

Wyman v. Newhouse’s Empirical Analysis

93 F.2d 313 · 1937

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
6
states following
August 1997
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 1997

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

501937194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thompson v. Thompson · Cragin v. Lovell · Gray v. . Richmond Bicycle Co. · Jaster v. Currie · Jaster v. Currie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This judgment is attacked for fraud perpetrated upon the appellee which goes to the jurisdiction of the Florida court over his person. A judgment procured fraudulently, as here, lacks jurisdiction and is null and void. [Cases omitted.] A fraud affecting the jurisdiction is equivalent to a lack of jurisdiction. [Cases omitted.] The appellee was not required to proceed against the judgment in Florida. His equitable defense in answer to a suit on the judgment is sufficient. A judgment recovered in a sister state, through the fraud of the party procuring the appearance of another, is not binding on the latter when an attempt is made to enforce such judgment in another state. Gray v. Richmond Bicycle Co., 167 N.Y. 348, 355 , 60 N.E. 663 , 82 Am.St.Rep. 720 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Durant v. Durant

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.