Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 F.2d 792 - Walker v. United States

Walker v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

93 F.2d 792 · 1938

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
May 1991
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently May 1991 · most notably United States v. Grunewald (1956), United States v. Perlstein (1942)

32 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

1501938194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 632

Relies on Quercia v. United States · United States v. Cruikshank · Pettibone v. United States · United States v. Hess · Walker v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The terms of the statute, the evil it was enacted to prevent, and the protection it was intended to provide, leave no doubt that under its true interpretation each of those who are subpoenaed to come, of those who are called and accept the call to come without subpoenas, of those who are prompted to come by their interests, of those who expect to come, and of those who are selected and expected to come to testify in any case in any court of the United States, falls within the class described by the terms ‘any witness, in any court of the United States,’ in the section under consideration.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.