Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 F.3d 1112 - Catlin v. Sobol

Catlin v. Sobol’s Empirical Analysis

93 F.3d 1112 · 1996

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
May 2014
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently May 2014 · most notably Golden Pacific Bancorp v. Federal Deposit Insurance (2001), Conroy v. New York State Department of Correctional Services (2003)

26 federal appellate · 3 district ·

190199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · Plyler v. Doe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he court must resolve all ambiguities and draw all inferences in favor of the non-moving party.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he traditional test for residency requires both physical presence plus intent to remain.” Catlin v. Sobol, 93 F.3d 1112 , 1119 (2d Cir.1996) (citing Martinez v. Bynum, 461 U.S. 321 , 330, 103 S.Ct. 1838 , 75 L.Ed.2d 879 (1983)). Thus, despite the generally distinct meanings of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.