Latiolais’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2025
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bounds v. Smith · Price v. Johnston · Johnson v. Avery · Stone v. Morris · Terry Ray Taylor v. M. M. (Hoot) Gibson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Plaintiffs’ case turned largely on judging the credibility of the prisoners versus the prison officials. While the need to make credibility assessments “does not mean, of course, that the petitioner’s presence will be required,” it is an important consideration to be carefully weighed....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hawks v. Timms
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.