Edgar v. Kl’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2024
2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Liteky et al United States · Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. · United States v. Murphy · United States v. Balistrieri
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“enters the record and may be controverted or tested by the tools of the adversary process,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“This is “personal” knowledge no less than if the judge had decided to take an undercover tour of a mental institution to see how the patients were treated. Instead of going himself, this judge appointed agents, who made a private report of how they investigated and what they had learned. Mandatory disqualification under § 455(b) (1) follows.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“declined to state on the record his own memories of what happened”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.