Wicklund v. Salvagni’s Empirical Analysis
93 F.3d 567 · 1996
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth · Bellotti v. Baird · City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc. · Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public Schools · Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(4) If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the petitioner is sufficiently mature to decide whether to have an abortion, the court shall issue an order authorizing the minor to consent to the performance or inducement of an abortion without the notification of a parent or guardian.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lambert v. Wicklund“the procedure must allow the minor to show that, even if she cannot make the abortion decision by herself, `the desired abortion would be in her best interests.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lambert v. Wicklund“the notification of a parent or guardian is not in the best interests of the [minor].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lambert v. Wicklund
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.