Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 F.3d 581 - Harris v. Wright

Harris v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

93 F.3d 581 · 1996

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
6
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably State v. Pittman (2007), United States v. Doe (1998)

17 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

190199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gault · Furman v. Georgia · Colorado v. Connelly · Solem v. Helm · Harmelin v. Michigan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “grossly disproportionate to the crime being punished.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]hen a fragmented Court decides a case and no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, `the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “a fifteen-year-old's limited culpability for any crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.