Hamilton v. Lumsden’s Empirical Analysis
93 F.3d 648 · 1996
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2018
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 1 Cal. 3d 93 - Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co. · 37 Cal. 3d 591 - Mitchell v. Superior Court · Dant Russell Inc Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Dant & Russell Inc · In Re Khalil and Shahin Chinichian, Debtors. Khalil and Shahin Chinichian v. Attilio Campolongo · Resorts International, Inc. v. Lowenschuss
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The privilege is waived, however, only when the client tenders an issue touching directly upon the substance or content of an attorney-client communication — not when the testimony sought would be only “one .of several forms of indirect evidence” about an issue. Rockwell International Corp. v. Superior Court, 26 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1268 [ 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 153 ] (1994), quoting Mitchell v. Superior Court, 37 Cal.3d 591 , 691 P.2d 642, 650 , 208 Cal.Rptr. 886 (Cal.1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.