United States v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis
93 F.3d 67 · 1996
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably United States v. Bowers (2010), United States v. McDowell (1997)
18 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United States v. McAndrews · United States v. Lawal · United States v. Pridgen · United States v. Chavarria-Herrara · United States v. Arishi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) in violation of the law; (2) a misapplication of the [federal sentencing] Guidelines; (3) an upward departure from the Guidelines; or (4) a plainly unreasonable penalty for an offense not included in the Guidelines.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“no reason why Rule 35(b) motions should be governed by a different standard.”) (quoting Doe, 93 F.3d at 68 ); see also United States v. Poland, 562 F.3d 35 , 40 (1st Cir.2009) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the appealability of an order resolving a Rule 35(b) motion is not controlled by 18 U.S.C. § 3742 because such an order is not, properly speaking, a sentence. . . . An order granting or denying a Rule 35(b) motion is, thus, a final decision for purposes of section 1291.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.