Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 F.3d 671 - Ferreira v. Borja

Ferreira v. Borja’s Empirical Analysis

93 F.3d 671 · 1996

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Todd Hiivala v. Tana Wood (1999), Jeffries v. Wood (1997)

17 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1801996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 48 U.S.C. § 1681 · 48 U.S.C. § 1824

Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp. · Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission · United States v. Houser · Leslie Salt Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the highest court of the Northern Mariana Islands from which a decision could be had in all cases involving the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, or any authority exercised thereunder . . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Surely a court that has decided that it has jurisdiction is not duty-bound to entertain thereafter a series of repetitive motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he doctrine of `law of the case' is inapplicable to the question of our jurisdiction to consider an appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.