Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

93 Fla. 935

113 So 94

Cravatt v. Pierson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 20, 1927

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1927-04-20

Relies on State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung · Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys · Quigg v. Radel

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1927-04-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2009

4 state decisions

20192719301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the judgment rendered by the trial court to which the writ of error is addressed should be reversed while Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Strum and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that said judgment should be affirmed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion the judgment will be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 South. Rep. 380, and State ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55, 100 South. Rep. 796. Yarnell v. Gregory, 88 Fla. 91, Broaddus v. Theurer, 92 Fla. —.

¶2 An order will be entered affirming the judgment herein.

¶3 All concur.

/93/fla/935 · .json · Public domain