In Re Schenectady Ry. Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 1980
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 501 · 42 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 1 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on In re Public Ledger, Inc. · Kaftan v. Siegel · Bowen v. Hockley · 63 F. Supp. 1008 - In Re Public Ledger, Inc. · In re Compania De Los Ferrocarriles De Puerto Rico
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to knowingly conform to the terms of a contract * * is quite different from its assumption”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.