93 F. Supp. 2d 1090 - Egan v. Schmock’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 3601 (§ 801 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 42 U.S.C. § 3617 (§ 818 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968))
Relies on Jenkins v. McKeithen · 7 Cal. 4th 1 - Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn. · Lucas v. Department of Corrections · Albrecht v. Lund · Argabright v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any dispute between neighbors of different races or religions could result in a lawsuit in a federal court under the FHA.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.