93 F. Supp. 2d 376 - Schweizer v. Mulvehill’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]he purpose of such notice is to afford other parties an opportunity to object to the production or inspection, or to serve a demand for additional documents or things. Such additional notice is not needed with respect to a deposition because of the requirement of notice imposed by Rule 30 or 31. But when production or inspection is sought independently of a deposition, other parties may need notice in order to monitor the discovery and in order to pursue access to any information that may or should be produced.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Murphy v. Board of Education

2. “The attorney’s obligations [to the client] transcend those prevailing in the commercial marketplace. The duty to deal fairly, honestly, and with undivided loyalty superimposes onto the attorney-client relationship a set of special and unique duties, including maintaining confidentiality,' avoiding conflicts of interest, operating competently, safeguarding client property and honoring the clients’ interest over the attorney’s.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 951 F. Supp. 2d 504 - Lan Sang v. Ming Hai

3. “[p]unitive damages are available in cases of breach of fiduciary duty, so long as a very high degree of moral culpability is exhibited.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Shulman v. Chaitman LLP