Xoom, Inc. v. Imageline, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 103 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 504 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp. · Wrenn v. Board of Directors · Edgar v. McVey Trucking Co. · Beale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there should be only one award of statutory damages per registration regardless of the number of infringements or the number of products containing infringing images.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Xoom Incorporated“New art and new text, as well as a new packaging design, for CD-ROM and diskette media.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Xoom Incorporated
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.