State v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Baehr v. Lewin · State v. Estrada · State v. Gaylord · State v. Fukusaku · State v. Valera
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause the court believed it had no discretion in choosing the sentence to be imposed other than to sentence Defendant as it did”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Revocation, modification of probation conditions. (1) The court, on application of ... the prosecuting attorney, ... after a hearing, may revoke probation, reduce or enlarge the conditions of a sentence of probation^] [[Image here]] (3) The court shall revoke probation if the defendant has inexcusably failed to comply with a substantial requirement imposed as a condition of the order[.] [[Image here]] (5) When the court revokes probation, it may impose on the defendant any sentence that might have been imposed originally for the crime of which the defendant was convicted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Putnam
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.