Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 Haw. 34 - State v. Sequeira

State v. Sequeira’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2021

10 state decisions

40200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663

Relies on Gall v. United States · State v. Gaylord · State v. Hernandez · United States v. Gibbens · United States v. Meacham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “have likewise concluded that the government is not a victim entitled to restitution where public moneys are expended in pursuit of solving crimes, as these expenditures represent normal operating costs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.