State v. Castro’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · Drope v. Missouri · Cannady v. United States · State v. Tyrrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No person who as a result of a physical or mental disease, disorder, or defect lacks capacity to understand the proceedings against the person or to assist in the person’s own defense shall be tried, convicted, or sentenced for the commission of an offense so long as such incapacity endures.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Tierney · State v. Harter.“(1) Whenever the defendant has filed a notice of intention to rely on the defense of physical or mental disease, disorder, or defect excluding responsibility, or there is reason to doubt the defendant’s fitness to proceed, or reason to believe that the physical or mental disease, disorder, or defect of the defendant will or has become an issue in the case, the court may immediately suspend all further proceedings in the prosecution.... (2) Upon suspension of further proceedings in the prosecution, the court shall appoint three qualified examiners in felony cases ... to examine and reporL upon the physical and mental condition of the defendant.... [[Image here]] (6) The report of the examination, including any supporting documents, shall be filed in triplicate with the clerk of the court, who shall cause copies to be delivered to the prosecuting attorney and to counsel for the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Plichta“Pursuant to HRS § 704-403, the trial court must determine whether the defendant either (1) lacks capacity to understand the proceedings against him or her; or (2) lacks capacity to assist in his or her defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Tierney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.