Dukes v. Working’s Empirical Analysis
1884
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1936
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Caldwell · Hays v. Tippy · Beeber v. Bevan · Coulter v. Coulter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This proceeding is not, in any proper sense, a ciA'il action or a cíaúI case. It is a special proceeding, authorized by the general assembly for the express purpose of promoting public health or improving public highways. Throughout Hie entire statute it is manifest that ¡he legislature <li<l not intend that such a. proceeding should be subjected to any of the delays ordinarily Incident to the trial of a civil cause.” .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Ditch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.