Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 KAN 579 - Ross v. Perkins

Ross v. Perkins’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 1949
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 1949

7 state decisions

301914192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wuester v. Folin · Nolan v. Otney · Young v. McWilliams · Brady v. Fuller · Kelsa v. Graves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There may be grounds for appellees to complain of the decision setting aside the transfer as to one-half of the land and giving appellant a title to one-half of it, but they have filed no cross appeal and are not in a position to allege error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.