93 Md. App. 364 - Balderston v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3585
Relies on Maus v. State · 119 Wash. 2d 204 - State v. Speaks · State v. Reynolds · 138 Ill. 2d 152 - People v. Ramos · United States v. Zackular
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[V]oluntary home detention, a situation in which a defendant can leave his home to go to work, and has freedom of movement and association within his home, cannot be considered "custodial," or the equivalent of custody. On the contrary, the reason appellant requested that he be permitted to participate in home confinement is because it is not the equivalent of custody, i.e. , he could tend to his responsibilities and maintain his job.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“incarcerative custody, not mere supervision. That is, the custody had to be involuntary and pursuant to a court commitment to a public institution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.