Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 Me. 378 - Chapman v. Decrow

Chapman v. Decrow’s Empirical Analysis

1899

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
5
states following
January 1984
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 1984

4 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

401899190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. M'Duffie · Livermore v. Batchelder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But, it is said that section 11, which provides a civil liability for stealing or killing a registered dog, by implication outlaws all that are not registered, and authorizes anybody to steal or kill them. If this provision' adds any remedy not known to the common law, it certainly does not take away rights previously existing by it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.