93 Mich. 480
Decided November 18, 1892
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1892-11-18
<p>Ejectment — Parties—Husband and wife.</p> <p>The wife is a necessary party to an action of ejectment to recover possession of premises occupied by her and her husband as a homestead.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1898
1 state decisions
Relies on Hodson v. Van Fossen
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1892-11-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1This is ejectment, brought to recover possession of premises occupied by defendant and his wife for some years as a homestead. The wife was not joined as a defendant. For this and other reasons, which it is not necessary to discuss, the trial judge directed a verdict for defendant.
¶2The case is ruled by Hodson v. Van Fossen, 26 Mich. 68; Henry v. Gregory, 29 Id. 68; Rowe v. Kellogg, 54 Id. 206; Cleaver v. Bigelow, 61 Id. 47; Haddy v. Tobias, 85 Id. 326, — and the judgment is affirmed.