Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 MINN 45 - Laird v. Vila

Laird v. Vila’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
5
states following
January 1954
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 1954

22 state decisions

60190419101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kofka v. Rosicky · 10 N.J. Eq. 332 - Johnson v. Hubbell · Carmichael v. Carmichael · Ahrens v. . Jones · Svanburg v. Fosseen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the proof to sustain such an agreement must in all particulars be clear, positive, and convincing. The necessity of requiring a strict degree of proof to establish an issue of this character is too patent to warrant extended elaboration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.