Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 MO 524 - Williams v. Hudson

Williams v. Hudson’s Empirical Analysis

1887

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
November 1942
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 1942 · most notably State ex rel. Potter v. Riley (1909), Morey Engineering & Construction Co. v. St. Louis Artificial Ice Rink Co. (1912)

27 state decisions

1001887189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Freeman v. Thompson · Stafford v. Fizer · Gitchell v. Kreidler · Lenox v. Clarke · Bollinger v. Chouteau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . The purchaser at the execution sale and his vendee stand in the position of one having purchased under a foreclosure of a senior mortgage;' the junior mortgagee not having been made a party to the suit. The plaintiffs in this case, being the purchasers under the unforeclosed deed of trust, may redeem from the tax sale; but that sale is not void, and will- not be set aside, for no offer to redeem is made in this suit. ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.