Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

93 N.C. App. 639

379 S.E.2d 93

Hamilton v. Hamilton

This page is marked noindex.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1989-05-16

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-05-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2016

16 state decisions

801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Judge PHILLIPS

¶1concurring in the result.

¶2I agree that the appeal has no merit and the order must be affirmed. But since the court’s findings clearly support the order only one question material to the appeal is raised, in my opinion; a question not raised by plaintiff but by the record — Are the court’s material findings of fact supported by competent evidence? The questions that plaintiff stated in his brief — whether the court “committed reversible error” in denying his motion to dismiss defendant’s motion at different stages of the hearing, and in receiving certain items of evidence — are irrelevant to an appeal from a judge’s findings, conclusions, and order, and discussing them tends to obfuscate rather than clarify the problem involved and its proper solution. Certainly this modification of a child custody order is not subject to Rule 41, N.C. Rules of Civil Procedure, which has to do with the “Dismissal of Actions.”

/93/ncapp/639 · .json · Public domain