93 N.C. App. 757 - State v. Farris’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 77 N.C. App. 192 - State v. Hensley · State v. Davidson · 89 N.C. App. 465 - State v. Blankenship
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[I]n those rare instances where the use of the older prior convictions [is] not more prejudicial than probative, the trial court must make appropriate findings of fact.” These findings must concern “specific facts and circumstances which demonstrate the probative value outweighs the prejudicial effect.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.