Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 NEV 587 - Keck v. Peckham

Keck v. Peckham’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1979
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Lipshie v. Tracy Investment Co. · Potter v. MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY · Swartz v. Adams · Crescent v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Summary judgment is appropriate only when it is clear what the truth is and there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact. Potter v. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co., 93 Nev. 90 , 560 P.2d 914 (1977). “In deciding the .propriety of the summary judgment, we must review the evidence most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted and give that party the benefit of all favorable inferences that may be drawn from the subsidiary facts.” Lipshie v. Tracy Investment Co., 93 Nev. 370, 375 , 566 P.2d 819, 822 (1977).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.