Armour v. Armour

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1977

Nevada Supreme Court · decided 1977-02-16

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1978

2 state decisions

Applies NV 125 § 125.150

Relies on Todkill v. Todkill · Jolley v. Jolley · Benavidez v. Benavidez

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-02-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION

Per Curiam:

¶2After the district court entered judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage and distributing the community property, Moment Lea Armour appealed complaining of her share of the property distribution.

¶3After reviewing the record, we believe the distribution was equitable and perceive no abuse of discretion. NRS 125.150; Benavidez v. Benavidez, 92 Nev. 539, 554 P.2d 256 (1976); Jolley v. Jolley, 92 Nev. 298, 549 P.2d 1407 (1976); Todkill v. Todkill, 88 Nev. 231, 495 P.2d 629 (1972).

¶4Affirmed.