Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 N.H. 17 - Scribner v. Wikstrom

Scribner v. Wikstrom’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
4
states following
February 1971
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 1971

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

601943195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on James v. Dravo Contracting Co. · Surplus Trading Co. v. Cook · Crozier v. Fried. Krupp Aktiengesellschaft · Sweet v. Rechel · Citizens' National Bank v. Donnell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whether a state has power to tax land acquired by the United States in accordance with the provisions of Art. 1, § 8, cl. 17, of the Federal Constitution, or to tax property situated thereon, depends upon whether the power of the state to so tax is reserved in the legislative enactment granting consent to the acquisition. James v. Dravo Contracting Company, 302 U.S. 134, 147 , 58 S.Ct. 208 , 82 L.Ed. 155 , 114 A.L.R. 318 , and cases cited; 1 Cooley, Taxation, 4th Ed., § 92, pp. 220, 221. And since the power to tax was not reserved by chapter 149 of the Laws of 1939, it follows that the town of Webster could not legally tax the defendant’s property on April 1, 1941, if the United States had acquired the land on which that property was located prior to that date.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.